What do you think of this cartoon, published in the Santa Fe Reporter, May 16-22, 2018?
“The Wisdom of Repugnance”
In the June 2, 1997 issue of the New Republic, bioethicist Leon Kass argues in his article about human cloning (underline added):
“Offensive.” “Grotesque.” “Revolting.” “Repugnant.” “Repulsive.” These are the words most commonly heard regarding the prospect of human cloning…Revulsion is not an argument; and some of yesterday’s repugnances are today calmly accepted – though, one must add, not always for the better. In crucial cases, however, repugnance is the emotional expression of deep wisdom, beyond reason’s power fully to articulate it.
There was no deep wisdom exhibited by the editor/publisher of the SF Reporter, Julie Ann Grimm, in printing this cartoon. And there has been much repugnance of her grotesque, offensive choice in printing it. The cartoon is displayed on page 6 without commentary, context, or validity. It is a grotesque throwback to blatant anti-Semitism of the 1930s. It is placed in a very prominent location, just floating as a clear indication of the editor’s own viewpoint by choice.
In many ways this is a cowardly act by the editor. Sitting without commentary the cartoon provides no context to the general Santa Fe community. It does not attempt to show any balance in a complicated war on Israel’s southern border. It implicitly puts blame on the Israelis and the US’ embassy move to Jerusalem for the death of children of Gaza with no clear statement of responsibility on Hamas for the conditions and “protests” they have forced on their populations. It is about as anti-Semitic a choice as an editor can get.
Send a letter to the editor and/or call to register your protest that (1) this anti-Semitic cartoon was published and (2) demand that it be taken down from their website. You can also comment online under the cartoon here. Contact information: Editorial Phone: 505-988-7530, email: editor@sfreporter.com. Or call Julie Ann Grimm directly: 505-988-5541 Ext 1215.
Our tips for writing letters to the editor include the admonition to “be polite.” In this extremely repugnant case, however, you may be inclined to let your “emotional expression of deep wisdom” flow through.
If you wish to add one or two further facts about the Hamas’ attempt at invading Israel, see the Bret Stephens article below from yesterday’s New York Times. We’ve emboldened and underlined text that are clear points you can make in your communications.
A better cartoon for the SF Reporter to consider? How about this one:
Did you know that the US House of Representatives voted 415-0 to pass the Hamas Human Shields Prevention Act (H.R. 3542) which condemns the use of human shields by Hamas and mandates sanctions against those members of the terrorist group that engages in the practice? The legislation is now awaiting action in the Senate.
Gaza’s Miseries Have Palestinian Authors
May 16, 2018, New York Times
By Bret Stephens
For the third time in two weeks, Palestinians in the Gaza Strip have set fire to the Kerem Shalom border crossing, through which they get medicine, fuel and other humanitarian essentials from Israel. Soon we’ll surely hear a great deal about the misery of Gaza. Try not to forget that the authors of that misery are also the presumptive victims.
There’s a pattern here — harm yourself, blame the other — and it deserves to be highlighted amid the torrent of morally blind, historically illiterate criticism to which Israelis are subjected every time they defend themselves against violent Palestinian attack.
In 1970, Israel set up an industrial zone along the border with Gaza to promote economic cooperation and provide Palestinians with jobs. It had to be shut down in 2004 amid multiple terrorist attacks that left 11 Israelis dead.
In 2005, Jewish-American donors forked over $14 million dollars to pay for greenhouses that had been used by Israeli settlers until the government of Ariel Sharon withdrew from the Strip. Palestinians looted dozens of the greenhouses almost immediately upon Israel’s exit.
In 2007, Hamas took control of Gaza in a bloody coup against its rivals in the Fatah faction. Since then, Hamas, Islamic Jihad and other terrorist groups in the Strip have fired nearly 10,000 rockets and mortars from Gaza into Israel — all the while denouncing an economic “blockade” that is Israel’s refusal to feed the mouth that bites it. (Egypt and the Palestinian Authority also participate in the same blockade, to zero international censure.)
In 2014 Israel discovered that Hamas had built 32 tunnels under the Gaza border to kidnap or kill Israelis. “The average tunnel requires 350 truckloads of construction supplies,” The Wall Street Journal reported, “enough to build 86 homes, seven mosques, six schools or 19 medical clinics.” Estimated cost of tunnels: $90 million.
Want to understand why Gaza is so poor? See above.
Which brings us to the grotesque spectacle along Gaza’s border over the past several weeks, in which thousands of Palestinians have tried to breach the fence and force their way into Israel, often at the cost of their lives. What is the ostensible purpose of what Palestinians call “the Great Return March”?
That’s no mystery. This week, The Times published an op-ed by Ahmed Abu Artema, one of the organizers of the march. “We are intent on continuing our struggle until Israel recognizes our right to return to our homes and land from which we were expelled,” he writes, referring to homes and land within Israel’s original borders.
His objection isn’t to the “occupation” as usually defined by Western liberals, namely Israel’s acquisition of territories following the 1967 Six Day War. It’s to the existence of Israel itself. Sympathize with him all you like, but at least notice that his politics demand the elimination of the Jewish state.
Notice, also, the old pattern at work: Avow and pursue Israel’s destruction, then plead for pity and aid when your plans lead to ruin.
The world now demands that Jerusalem account for every bullet fired at the demonstrators, without offering a single practical alternative for dealing with the crisis.
But where is the outrage that Hamas kept urging Palestinians to move toward the fence, having been amply forewarned by Israel of the mortal risk? Or that protest organizers encouraged women to lead the charges on the fence because, as The Times’s Declan Walsh reported, “Israeli soldiers might be less likely to fire on women”? Or that Palestinian children as young as 7 were dispatched to try to breach the fence? Or that the protests ended after Israel warned Hamas’s leaders, whose preferred hide-outs include Gaza’s hospital, that their own lives were at risk?
Elsewhere in the world, this sort of behavior would be called reckless endangerment. It would be condemned as self-destructive, cowardly and almost bottomlessly cynical.
The mystery of Middle East politics is why Palestinians have so long been exempted from these ordinary moral judgments. How do so many so-called progressives now find themselves in objective sympathy with the murderers, misogynists and homophobes of Hamas? Why don’t they note that, by Hamas’s own admission, some 50 of the 62 protesters killed on Monday were members of Hamas? Why do they begrudge Israel the right to defend itself behind the very borders they’ve been clamoring for years for Israelis to get behind?
Why is nothing expected of Palestinians, and everything forgiven, while everything is expected of Israelis, and nothing forgiven?
That’s a question to which one can easily guess the answer. In the meantime, it’s worth considering the harm Western indulgence has done to Palestinian aspirations.
No decent Palestinian society can emerge from the culture of victimhood, violence and fatalism symbolized by these protests. No worthy Palestinian government can emerge if the international community continues to indulge the corrupt, anti-Semitic autocrats of the Palestinian Authority or fails to condemn and sanction the despotic killers of Hamas. And no Palestinian economy will ever flourish through repeated acts of self-harm and destructive provocation.
If Palestinians want to build a worthy, proud and prosperous nation, they could do worse than try to learn from the one next door. That begins by forswearing forever their attempts to destroy it.
Stephens makes some excellent points in his earlier piece, “Jewish Power at 70 Years” (April 20, 2018, New York Times – underlining added):
Israel did not come into existence to serve as another showcase of the victimization of Jews. It exists to end the victimization of Jews.
That’s a point that Israel’s restless critics could stand to learn. On Friday, Palestinians in Gaza returned for the fourth time to the border fence with Israel, in protests promoted by Hamas. The explicit purpose of Hamas leaders is to breach the fence and march on Jerusalem. Israel cannot possibly allow this — doing so would create a precedent that would encourage similar protests, and more death, along all of Israel’s borders — and has repeatedly used deadly force to counter it.
The armchair corporals of Western punditry think this is excessive. It would be helpful if they could suggest alternative military tactics to an Israeli government dealing with an urgent crisis against an adversary sworn to its destruction. They don’t.
It would also be helpful if they could explain how they can insist on Israel’s retreat to the 1967 borders and then scold Israel when it defends those borders. They can’t. If the armchair corporals want to persist in demands for withdrawals that for 25 years have led to more Palestinian violence, not less, the least they can do is be ferocious in defense of Israel’s inarguable sovereignty. Somehow they almost never are.
SFMEW is a beneficiary organization of the Jewish Federation of New Mexico
Whatever your political tendencies, get involved during this election season to be sure pro-Israel candidates are nominated during the June 5 primaries, and elected in November. This is particularly important related to Congressional Districts 1 (ABQ area) and 2 (Southern NM), from which our current, consistently pro-Israel Members of Congress are retiring from Congress to run for NM Governor. Ask to see the Israel position papers of the candidates you are considering – Republican or Democrat, and make it clear that their support for Israel is an important part of your decision.